Michigan Players in the NBA

Hope Kobe lands somewhere and plays really well!

1 Like

I’m trying to think of a team that could take a chance on giving some young guard a chance. Two years ago, I’d say the Pistons. Troy liked seeing if he could find a treasure from someone else’s trash. It never really paid off but he tried.

1 Like

Probably going to have to do some work in the g league then capitalize on opportunities. Otherwise it’ll be overseas. Best of luck to him.

1 Like

OK, so at this stage the intrigue in terms of roster decisions is basically “Will Houstan or Goldin start the year on the NBA roster?”

2 Likes

Choosing to believe they are actually cousins


12 Likes

This is a Clipper beat guy at the Athletic, can’t find elsewhere but maybe Vlad made the opening day roster?:

â€ȘLaw Murray :blue_book:‬

â€Ș@lawmurraythenu.bsky.social‬

· 6h

2025 undrafted class that won jobs: - Cardwell (SAC) - Love (POR) - Youngblood (OKC) - Hepburn (TOR) - Jones (DEN) - Ndiaye (ATL) - Sallis (PHI) - Telfort (LAC) - Sears (MIL) - Kelly (DAL) - Nembhard (DAL) - Bates (DEN) - Goldin (MIA) - Cisse (DAL) - Mañon (LAL) - Dickinson (NO) - Huntley (PHO)

Also, Hunter

1 Like

Vlad’s on a two-way, so is Hunter IIRC.

Yes I know - I’m saying I believe they’re both starting the season on the NBA team.

I hadn’t been following Hunter’s situation but had written that based on their roster of who was on guaranteed, two-way, and X10 contracts, Goldin being on the NBA roster in Miami made sense.

Gotcha, I think that’s mostly a list of two-way guys from the class though?

If two-way guys are gonna play around ~50 games, is there something meaningful about where they start the year? The G-League doesn’t begin yet, right? Genuinely not sure how that usually works out for those guyhs.

I think it means they’re in the top 15 (if teams are using all active slots) as of today. Plenty of two-way guys don’t really play - so I guess it’s a better sign than not being on the opening roster

Gotcha, looks like the rosters have 17-18 spots listed. I more just mean, it isn’t like trying to make the team or something, or like a bunch of two-way guys get cut at this point in the preseason.

A lot of Michigan guys, Big Ten guys and almost Michigan guys on the two-way roster :rofl:

I listed the following former UM players on two-way contracts: Houstan, Goldin and Livers plus Castleton and Dickinson. (Not to mention Almost-a-Wolverine Caleb Love.) I don’t follow the NBA nearly as much as you and many on the board, but my question is this: Which onw or two of the two-way contract players are a surprise to you that they “only” got as two-way contract? I mean, I don’t follow the NBA all that much and I don’t know exactly what NBA teams are exactly looking for, but I thought some of the players on the two-way list were REALLY good players in college.

It’s generally either a result of less than ideal size or incomplete skill set

Like Caleb Love was a good volume on-ball player, but is he so good at that that an NBA team is going to take reps from someone else? If not, what else is left?

I want the Suns in on Kobe. It’s the type of chance they need to be taking. They have the roster spot I believe too.

At the expense of Livers, tho?

1 Like

He’s in too. I think they just cut Butler and I thought I read they had an open spot now so Suns fans were confused why they’d cut him.

Kobe would be a nice gamble for their team. They need ball handlers and have no picks. A former first round pick coming off injuries makes a ton of sense at the end of the bench for them imo

2 Likes

They have 14 guaranteed contracts (room for 1 more) and 3 two-ways (maxed out)

So they could add 1 player. My feeling is that Bufkin at this stage doesn’t warrant a guaranteed deal and would be surprised if he got one, but an X10 or something to start makes sense

I’m not arguing it should be the case, but this team is SHOCKINGLY expensive (7th in payroll) given its quality (big booty cheeks), over the tax, and a minimum deal takes them over the first apron (not the dreaded second, most just cuts down on flexibility some). I don’t see them adding a guaranteed deal right now without Bufkin “proving it” first

3 Likes

Apparently, the Bufkin thing was a financial charade. The Nets were below the salary floor - at which point they don’t get luxury tax disbursements - despite having 15 guaranteed contracts and 3 two-ways. So, they waived Bufkin’s (guaranteed) deal, which they need to pay anyway, and signed another player, getting over the floor.

Don’t mean to be a naysayer but if that’s the rationale behind cutting him, his cachet is not particularly high.

3 Likes
3 Likes

Load management already for the King!

9 Likes