That idea seems cool but wonât the average kenpom subscriber have significant gaps in knowledge of certain teams? Like if Iâm asked to choose who is better 50 times between 100 total teams and 70% of the teams are like UC Santa Barbara itâs complete guesswork
I get it - cool concept. But itâs infinitely easier for people to vote on the teams near the top 25 instead of the teams 26-360whatever
My entire life is college basketball pretty much these days and I wouldnât feel comfortable whatsoever providing an accurate opinion outside of the top 100ish. Just donât get how thatâs gonna work
itâs just a fun exercise! one of the findings may well be that the rankings are pretty good 1-40 and end up increasingly useless as you get closer to the average D1 team.
also my understanding is that preseason polls are often predictive in models that know the outcome of a lot of in-season games. would be fun to add the HUMAN poll to that list.