@buckets12 was it at all controversial putting Starling this high? Notre Dame returns, I believe, 7 of their top 8 minutes from last year. Is this a Marvin Williams 2005 situation where the freshman super sub puts a bunch of good seniors over the top?
There was a bit of push back on Starling at first but it was much more âwhy do you have Kohler and Skyy so high you Big Ten homerâ than it was others vs. Starling. I think my original pitch was the same top 9 with Kohler at 10 and Skyy at like 12.
And just for the record my pitch with Kohler and Skyy being so high was essentially âthem being really good or really bad will 100% decide their teamâs seasonsâ. When discussing impact I wholeheartedly believe theyâre forced into being top 10 impact guys one way or another. Almost all the other guys 6-15 are just good NBA prospects who might not be asked to do much IMO.
from @kturnup in the B1G thread this stood out to me. Kentucky has serious Mich 21-22 letdown potential IMO. Four starters who canât shoot, two freshmen, an uptransfer with hella stankonius defense, and the whole blurb is about the sixth man? CJ Fredrick with his tattered hamstrings is the answer to all your spacing questions?
I like your assessment in general but think that Livingston is going to be more of a âguyâ for Kentucky that can seriously shoulder the load on offense than any of our freshman did last year. That will elevate their ceiling a bit
I feel like Tschibwe gives you a nice floor though. Similar to Dickinson post UNC, except even higher cause he just physically dominates on both ends in a way that Hunter does not.
Michigan was a top 25 team prob, so UKs floor is prob top 20. I agree I donât see them being a particularly enticing title contender unless Reeves is legit
I would like to think the overall talent level at Kentucky wonât be a complete bottoming out. ButâŚCal has been prone to having disasters every so often. And if that happens on the heels of how they went out last yearâŚ