kris dunn
buddy hield
taurean prince
denzel valentine
frank kaminsky
doug mcdermott
This is the list of upperclassmen drafted in the lottery in the past 4 drafts. Huerter better be a NPOY candidate if he comes back.
Edit:
2013 (a very weak draft) had a couple more than usual. But still, two NPOY candidates and CJ McCollum who was averaging 25+ ppg at a small school and beat Duke.
Iāve cone to the conclusion MSU will play Loyer and Winston a lot together the next two years, and it will be a good thing for MSU. number one reason being Winston is better served checking 2ās. There is some late season precedent for this case.
In regular season finale Brad Davison lit up MSU for 30. In the Big Ten tournament Izzo opted for Langford or McQuaid to check Davison. Placing Winston on Pritzl
At the end of Michigan vs MSU in Big Ten tournament game Izzo put Langford on Simpson and moved Winston onto Duncan Robinson
Now add Loyer to MSU, a phenomenal shooter who is going to play, it makes sense to continue with Winston at the 2 for extended minutes. Langford might even be better at the 3.
I should add Iām a big fan of Loyerās offensive game and quick jumper. Heās going to be good.
Winston has a better shot at guarding Poole than he does Simpson. Physically he canāt stay in front of Simpson. Because Poole vs Winston is a mismatch doesnāt preclude it from being MSUās best option.
I donāt think one game like that sets any kind of precedent, especially against a guy like Pritzl. The issues he faces with a lack of quickness will just be exchanged for a lack of height. Remember Stauskas abusing Appling in 2014 by simply realizing he could shoot over him with little space?
Iām also not sure your conclusion that heād be better on Poole is correct. Poole also has an incredibly quick first step, but he is far more aggressive than Simpson and has a legit three point shot so Winston canāt sag.
The entire notion that this will be helpful to MSUās defense is predicated on Loyer being better than Winston defending PGās OR Winston being better than McQuaid at guarding 2ās. I donāt think either of those things are going to be true.
Never said MSUās defense will be better with Loyer and Winston on the floor together. I would argue the opposite. Please read before responding. I do think there is a good chance MSUās team will be better with Winston and Loyer sharing the court together. Time will tell.
No need for random hostility, this is a sports message board lol.
Regardless, you said it would be good for MSU then proceeded to discuss defense, which will be almost laughably atrocious if Ward leaves and Loyer, Winston, McQuaid, and Langford get major minutes together. I cannot see any offensive boost overcoming how bad that lineup would be defensively.
Winston has no shot at guarding anybody. The best scenario, from Izzoās perspective, is to put Winston on the player least likely to put big points up against MSU.
I am assuming Winston is worse than Loyer defensively. I am not even sure if that is a safe assumption. Izzo is in trouble on the defensive end if Winston/Loyer are the go-to-duo.
Yeah, with Loyer itās still a question mark until he gets into a college strength program, but the current thoughts on his defense are pretty similar to Winston, but shorter and weaker. So ummm, big trouble could be correct.
I disagree that Winston would have a better chance guarding Poole than Simpson. One guy is pretty much a non-threat offensively barring major improvements. Yes Simpson is quick as hell and a bulldog but he wasnāt even looking for his own offense many games this season other than catch and shoot threes (that he missed many of) and transition opportunities. Simpson took those matchups personally and won them clearly but I still think heās the one guy you could āhideā a poor defender on and just hope he misses shots.
Poole would be able to shoot over any 6ā0ā guard, let alone two guys as slow laterally as Winston and Loyer. Poole didnāt struggle to get to the rim when he was in attack-mode as a freshman and Iād expect him to grow in that area as he gets a higher volume of possessions as a primary ball handler.
I feel Winston often doesnāt give much effort, this combined with his limitations leads to some ugly defense.
Michigan has had a lot of success with poor defensive teams, as we are all well aware.
I am interested to see Loyer and Winston on the court together to see how the dynamic plays out. To see how Izzo works them together. I will be watching intently. Iāll be surprised if it isnāt part of MSUās rotation. Certainly appears an upgrade to playing Winston and Nairn together
I am not. I think Winston/Loyer would be a significant downgrade from an already bad perimeter defense. Winston/Loyer will be an upgrade offensively (but it might take some time). Regardless, I think the downgrade in perimeter defense will be felt much more next year because MSU will lack the awesome rim protection they had. Winston basically unintentionally funneled the guy he was guarding into a shot-block. Next year Winston (and presumably Loyer) will be funneling opposing offensive players into layups and dunks.
Am I right in remembering that when DeJulius went off for 40+ against Clarkston they didnāt try to have Loyer guard him? If Winston canāt cover a shorter player that he can sag off on, I donāt like his chances against Poole. Iām looking forward to seeing them on the floor together. Should be fun to watch.