I am fine with that too but there has to be some stated criteria for BTT seeding. Or just flip a coin? KenPom standings?
Itās still in Michiganās hands to win the conference, so LFG. Love this schedule.
6 Likes
Wow, is this great. Can we sneak ten thousand well-masked students into Crisler to scream themselves hoarse?
We get the opportunity to send Josh Langford out to kiss the Spartan head at mid court after a 30 point loss on a senior night. And really thatās all we could ever ask for.
12 Likes
Tomorrow is huge. Win tomorrow and youāve pretty much guaranteed yourself the title.
2 Likes
This is the perfect revised schedule for us. Iāve been saying for awhile that anything more than 17 games was unnecessary and risky. Glad the folks in charge saw it the same way.
1 Like
Sounds about right. Lose one of Ohio State and Indiana, and lose one of Iowa and Illinois.
Also of note: Currently only 4 postponed games have not been rescheduled. The only one not involving Michigan is Purdue-Nebraska.
14-3 vs 15-5 isnāt that controversial imo. Illinois fans would have to argue weād lose 2 of 3 @PSU, @NW, and vs IU? Even if they beat us, I donāt think thatās much of an argument.
4 Likes
14-3 to 15-5 is the drama scenario?
Yeah 2 game difference in the loss column seems pretty cut and dry to me.
I would think 14-3 vs. 16-4 would be the scenario that would lead to the most outrage especially if we lose to the team that finishes 16-4.
1 Like
You all are right. I forgot what records prioritized over which. I need to right this stuff down ha.
1 Like
Beat Illinois and thereās basically going to be no drama no matter what. Easy peasy
6 Likes
Hypothetical, you can pick one game for Michigan to win between Iowa, OSU, and Illinois. Michigan loses the other 2. Which do you pick?
1 Like
It would knock out OSU for all practical purposes. But weād still have to be on guard for Illinois.
1 Like
Illinois, no question IMO.
5 Likes
