The problem with your “objective data” argument, is that the committee’s decisions are based in part on “subjective opinions.” How the field of 68 teams is picked for March Madness
You might not like that, but that’s how it works.
1 Like
Yes, which is exactly what led to the general dismay about Tennessee being a 3 and Duke being a 2. Committee seemingly subjectively gave Duke (K’s final ride?) a better seed when Tennessee objectively had the better resume. With a blind comparison, it really wasn’t that close.
1 Like