2019 - G - Nah'Shon Hyland (VCU Commit)

There should be absolutely no reason for him to play a single minute at the 5 this year, with Teske, Castleton, Faulds and Davis in place there.

1 Like

Beilein has a great track record of unearthing lightly recruited players that become good players - Novak, Levert, Rahk, Spike. There are also inevitable misses - Colton Christian, Ibi Watson, Bielfeldt (ymmv may vary there obviously). It’s the nature of the game.

My only point here is not that Nunez won’t work out - we all agree it’s ā€œwho knowsā€. It’s that I do t think we should have a high comfort level with the idea that he’s a major rotation player next year given:

A) his light recruitment profile
B) no sign at Michigan he’s ready

I think all evidence is that Beilein also wants other options at the position - he’s recruiting a slew of guys that can play the 2, or at least enable roster shifts that will cover the 2.

None of that is to say Nunez is a bust or won’t make it. I am saying that he hasn’t demonstrated he’s a player we just hand minutes to.

4 Likes

It’s proving hard for Beilein to hit that Ethan Happ/Cassius Winston sweet spot of players who are good enough to be all conference multiple years in college, but not good enough that they are prospects for early departure. That’s not necessarily bad, just the kind of guys Beilein recruits and develops.

1 Like

In the spring of 2012, Caris Levert seemed like a project to most - when John Groce moved on from Ohio U to Illinois, he didn’t even recruit Caris to join him.

3 Likes

This is 100% accurate, in my view. No one should write Nunez off yet, but I don’t believe the staff thinks he’ll be a big contributor next year.

Of course, in Levert’s case, even as a true freshman, he was too good to keep off the floor, despite the coaching staff’s initial inclination to redshirt him. Nunez was certainly behind that for his first year. But even if his ceiling is a solid backup at the 2/3, he’ll be worth the scholarship.

1 Like

Lol, is this hyland thread or nunez thread?

4 Likes

It seems like sometimes there is no space on this board for an opinion of ā€œthis guy still has plenty of opportunity to get better, but maybe he won’t be greatā€. I’m just saying I don’t understand the, to quote The Big Lebowski, ā€œCalmer n’ you areā€ attitude taken about a Brooks/Nunez tandem at the 2.

I mean, that’s VERY possibly a major problem.

1 Like

If you’re referring to my comments, please don’t misconstrue them. As it stands right now, I think Bajema is our best two guard, and that’s a scary proposition in the sense that he probably needs to gain 25 pounds. I’m not confident about Brooks and I think Nunez is a year away from being a rotational bench player.

1 Like

Not about any specific individual’s comments, and more things said by a number of people.

I would put X and Teske in that category, as I think they were undervalued in the ā€œall conference multiple yearsā€ discussion, but the way he’s doing it is working out OK for everyone so far.

1 Like

I’m not sure there’s a way to be particularly good at that. Also Beilein recruited Cassius a ton and instead got X who is about to be a 4 year guy. We are still consistently recruiting the 50-150 spot which should be the maximum shot at a really good 4 year guy.

There’s no secret recipe to getting those guys unless you want to strictly focus on undersized and less athletic players.

1 Like

He also averaged 15.5 at the prep school and he was averaging 4 sitting behind a kid who went to cincy. I agree he’s no lock but I think it’s too early to be expecting nothing. I didn’t love him two years ago when we took him , but when I watched his film this time around after the Jordan news I was pleasantly surprised and thought to myself I wonder why I was down on him so much before?

I don’t either, really. It’s largely a matter of luck, but we just don’t seem to be very lucky at it, compared to a team like Wisconsin.

For what it’s worth, though…if Winston had come here, he would possibly have been gone after his 2nd year, and definitely after this year.

Not sure if it’s luck, often has to do with the kind of guys we recruit. We recruit for a style that’s going to translate to the NBA. You could see the NBA potential in DJ the second he was recruited. Similar deal with Colin Castleton right now. I’d be shocked if he played 4 years because if he is able to to produce and be a starting-caliber college player, his skillset will be exactly what NBA teams want. For comparison, Nick Ward is never going to be what a NBA team wants as a 6’8" pure center who can’t move his feet.

If you want guys to stay 4 years you need to have either

  1. Worse players
  2. Guys with major flaws or styles that aren’t going to translate to the NBA. In college, weird skillsets can often thrive more than they do in the NBA. So finding ā€œweird guysā€ is the key to having elite players stay 4 years. And I think it can be pretty easy to determine that in the recruiting process.
3 Likes

The tricky part about this is that finding guys who don’t translate to the NBA might be easy, but a lot of those guys don’t translate to college for the same reason that they are weird. Identifying the ones that do is a bit trickier.

3 Likes

You saw nba potential in dj when he arrived on campus?

There were a few of us that saw the height, athletic ability, the ability to shoot and could see that he very much had a potential path to the league.

1 Like

I thought that his possible peak would be a late first/early second round kind of guy… but if you are tall, long and can shoot the NBA WILL draft you.

He also had a high bust rate since he was so skinny and wasn’t a great athlete coming out of high school, but I think it was clear he had the skillset to go pro it if he could put it together and mature physically.

We also, at least in the past, were very good at developing players’ offensive skills, and quickly.

Tom Izzo, on the other hand, emphasizes defense above all else, and his players often develop much slower on the offensive end of the court. Payne, IMO, is a prime example. There’s no way that guy would have stayed at Michigan for four years, because he would have been a big time scorer in two years. I’d say the same about guys like Appling, Langford, and McQuaid - all of them would have been much better scorers earlier in their careers at Michigan.

Similarly, a guy like Stauskas probably would have been a four year player for MSU. Same with DJ Wilson.

Xavier Tillman will be an interesting test case. If he gets enough touches next year - both inside and outside (he’s shown some ability to make threes) - he could crack the first round in the 2020 draft. Honestly, he had declared this year, I think he’s the type of guy who would have really made a name for himself in workouts and at the combine.