I was using the barttovik numbers which like Michigan a bit more, but it’s similar. So kenpom gives a 61% chance of the winning the 3 home games. (And we’ve had pretty good success against PU, so who knows…)
There’s a much greater probability of winning the games than this…
Looking at Torvik’s stuff, it looks like their two leading scorers are pretty inefficient - Watson horribly so, just an awful shooter. Palmer seems to get by on getting to the line.
The have a 6’8” guy off the bench (Anton Gill) who is a fifth year senior who nailing threes all over, but really never had prior to this year. He was a Louisville washout.
Have us losing just one more game, by my read. Agree with those who say some randomness asserts itself somewhere, but this is a team with really nice set of complementary players/assets. Would just love if the whole team got very hot from three and blew some people out so the players get a glimpse of their ceiling.
Love Miles for his personality, but it boggles my mind when a coach says that they expect Michigan to play some zone defense. Michigan has played 1295 possessions of man-to-man. 21 possessions of zone.
Now maybe they do bust something out, but you hear coaches say this all the time like Michigan is a team that changes up defenses like Illinois or something.