I'm hoping that doesn't mean Wilkes will see himself as redundant, which he shouldn't because he is good enough to play regardless of our roster construction.
I hope Windsor is right, about Matthews having more 'guard' abilities than what he did/was able to show at Kentucky. But, even if he is a below-average shooter, I still like what it looks like he would definitely bring to the table.
While I have really liked the looks of our 2017 board, it would be great to get a (formerly) high-ranked recruit and immediate stability in the class. I would love to think that we will get mostly 1A and 1B options, Matthews seems much preferable to gambling on getting those first choices, missing, then going to second options.